
Indexed in
License and use
Analysis of institutional authors
Alcaraz Carrillo De Albornoz VCorresponding AuthorMolina Millán JAuthorPublic-private partnerships: pro-cyclical or counter-cyclical? an empirical study
Publicated to:International Journal Of Construction Management. 24 (1): 97-107 - 2024-01-02 24(1), DOI: 10.1080/15623599.2023.2245629
Authors: de Albornoz, VAC; Ke, YJ; Millan, JM
Affiliations
Abstract
The use of public works programs to combat economic recessions is a recurring issue. In this paper we conducted an empirical analysis covering 160 countries (out of which 43 were retained) over 30 years, to determine to what extent it has been possible in the past to deploy PPPs as part of a wider countercyclical policy. The main criterion used in the analyses performed is the comparison between numbers and values of PPP projects reaching financial close during recessions and those outside a recession. The results are disappointing: only a handful of European countries have been successful. The only sensible approach, that works only in some developed nations, would be increasing the number of PPP projects while maintaining project size. This research contributes to the understanding of PPP adoption during economic recessions, sheds light on the different strategies of developed and developing countries, and emphasizes the challenges and opportunities associated with implementing countercyclical PPP policies. These insights can inform policymakers, practitioners, and researchers in their decision-making processes and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of PPP project procurement and management.
Keywords
Quality index
Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel
The work has been published in the journal International Journal Of Construction Management due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2024 there are still no calculated indicators, but in 2023, it was in position 153/407, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Management.
From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 1.17, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)
Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-14, the following number of citations:
- WoS: 1
- Scopus: 2
Impact and social visibility
Leadership analysis of institutional authors
This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Australia.
There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (ALCARAZ CARRILLO DE ALBORNOZ, VICENTE) and Last Author (MOLINA MILLAN, JUAN).
the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been ALCARAZ CARRILLO DE ALBORNOZ, VICENTE.