{rfName}
Fo

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Grant support

This research was funded by Ministerio de Economia, industria y Competitividad (Spain) grant number SAF2017-88771-R; Ministerio Ciencia e Innovacion (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 "ERDF A way of making Europe", Spain) grant number PID2020-118821RB-I00 and Consejeria de Ciencia, Universidades e Innovacion de la CAM (Madrid, Spain) grant number IND2019/BMD-17134.

Analysis of institutional authors

Sanchez-Gonzalez, LuciaAuthor

Share

November 5, 2024
Publications
>
Article

Formal Meta-Analysis of Hypoxic Gene Expression Profiles Reveals a Universal Gene Signature

Publicated to:Biomedicines. 10 (9): 2229- - 2022-09-01 10(9), DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10092229

Authors: Puente-Santamaria, Laura; Sanchez-Gonzalez, Lucia; Pescador, Nuria; Martinez-Costa, Oscar; Ramos-Ruiz, Ricardo; del Peso, Luis

Affiliations

Fdn Parque Cientif Madrid, Genom Unit Cantoblanco, C Faraday 7, Madrid 28049, Spain - Author
Inst Salud Carlos III, Ctr Invest Biomed Red Diabet & Enfermedades Metab, Madrid 28029, Spain - Author
Inst Salud Carlos III, Ctr Invest Biomed Red Enfermedades Resp CIBERES, Madrid 28029, Spain - Author
Sanitaria Hosp Univ La Paz, Inst Invest, IdiPaz, Madrid 28029, Spain - Author
Unidad Asociada Biomed CSIC UCLM, Albacete 02006, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Madrid UAM, Inst Invest Biomed Alberto Sols CSIC UAM, Dept Bioquim, Madrid 28029, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

Integrating transcriptional profiles results in identifying gene expression signatures that are more robust than those obtained for individual datasets. However, a direct comparison of datasets derived from heterogeneous experimental conditions is problematic, hence their integration requires applying of specific meta-analysis techniques. The transcriptional response to hypoxia has been the focus of intense research due to its central role in tissue homeostasis and prevalent diseases. Accordingly, many studies have determined the gene expression profile of hypoxic cells. Yet, despite this wealth of information, little effort has been made to integrate these datasets to produce a robust hypoxic signature. We applied a formal meta-analysis procedure to datasets comprising 430 RNA-seq samples from 43 individual studies including 34 different cell types, to derive a pooled estimate of the effect of hypoxia on gene expression in human cell lines grown ingin vitro. This approach revealed that a large proportion of the transcriptome is significantly regulated by hypoxia (8556 out of 20,888 genes identified across studies). However, only a small fraction of the differentially expressed genes (1265 genes, 15%) show an effect size that, according to comparisons to gene pathways known to be regulated by hypoxia, is likely to be biologically relevant. By focusing on genes ubiquitously expressed, we identified a signature of 291 genes robustly and consistently regulated by hypoxia. Overall, we have developed a robust gene signature that characterizes the transcriptomic response of human cell lines exposed to hypoxia in vitro by applying a formal meta-analysis to gene expression profiles.

Keywords

BindingDatabasGamma expressionHif-1-alphaHif-2-alphaHif-alphaHypoxiaIdentificationInducible factorsMechanismsMeta-analysiRnaseqTranscription

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Biomedicines due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position 68/278, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Pharmacology & Pharmacy.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 2.87, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-04, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 2
  • Google Scholar: 8

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-04:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 12.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 12 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.