{rfName}
Ca

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

27

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Pardo-Medina J.Author

Share

June 9, 2025
Publications
>
Chapter
No

Carotenoid production by filamentous fungi and yeasts

Publicated to:Biotechnology Of Yeasts And Filamentous Fungi. 225-279 - 2017-01-01 (), DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58829-2_8

Authors: Avalos J; Nordzieke S; Parra O; Pardo-Medina J; Limón MC

Affiliations

Departamento de Genética; Universidad de Sevilla; Apartado 1095; Sevilla; 41080; Spain - Author

Abstract

Carotenoids are widespread pigments in nature, obtained by direct synthesis or by ingestion in all taxonomic groups, and playing a large diversity of biological functions. Carotenoid biosynthesis is frequently found in fungi, and the amenability of some producing species to research studies has made them ideal models to investigate the genes and enzymes involved in the biosynthesis and its regulation. Best known examples are those for the production of β-carotene by the mucorales Phycomyces blakesleeanus, Mucor circinelloides, and Blakeslea trispora, neurosporaxanthin by the ascomycetes Neurospora crassa and Fusarium fujikuroi, and astaxanthin by the basidiomycete yeast Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous, formerly Phaffia rhodozyma. Because of their coloring and healthpromoting properties, some carotenoids have biotechnological applications, usually as food or feed additives. In the case of the fungi, the biotechnological studies have been mostly centered on the productions of β-carotene or its red precursor lycopene by B. trispora and astaxanthin by X. dendrorhous, extended to the heterologous expression of the relevant genes in non-carotenogenic yeasts as potentially favorable industrial producers. Less attention has been addressed to the synthesis of other carotenoids, with the only exception of torularhodin, produced by Rhodotorula and other related basidiomycete yeasts, but the genetics of its biosynthesis has not been investigated. © Springer International Publishing AG 2017.

Keywords

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 2.15, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Aug 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-08-21, the following number of citations:

  • Scopus: 26

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-08-21:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 42 (PlumX).