{rfName}
Co

APC

5 000,00 Euros
doaj

License and Use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Iglesias-Molina, ACorresponding AuthorCorcho, OAuthor

Share

March 25, 2025
Publications
>
Proceedings Paper

Comparison of Knowledge Graph Representations for Consumer Scenarios

Publicated to: Lecture Notes In Computer Science. 14265 271-289 - 2023-01-01 14265(), DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-47240-4_15

Authors:

Iglesias-Molina, A; Ahrabian, K; Ilievski, F; Pujara, J; Corcho, O
[+]

Affiliations

Univ Politecn Madrid, Ontol Engn Grp - Author
Univ Southern Calif, Inst Informat Sci - Author

Abstract

Knowledge graphs have been widely adopted across organizations and research domains, fueling applications that span interactive browsing to large-scale analysis and data science. One design decision in knowledge graph deployment is choosing a representation that optimally supports the application's consumers. Currently, however, there is no consensus on which representations best support each consumer scenario. In this work, we analyze the fitness of popular knowledge graph representations for three consumer scenarios: knowledge exploration, systematic querying, and graph completion. We compare the accessibility for knowledge exploration through a user study with dedicated browsing interfaces and query endpoints. We assess systematic querying with SPARQL in terms of time and query complexity on both synthetic and real-world datasets. We measure the impact of various representations on the popular graph completion task by training graph embedding models per representation. We experiment with four representations: Standard Reification, N-Ary Relationships, Wikidata qualifiers, and RDF-star. We find that Qualifiers and RDF-star are better suited to support use cases of knowledge exploration and systematic querying, while Standard Reification models perform most consistently for embedding model inference tasks but may become cumbersome for users. With this study, we aim to provide novel insights into the relevance of the representation choice and its impact on common knowledge graph consumption scenarios.
[+]

Keywords

Graph completionKnowledge graphsKnowledge representationSemantic webUser study

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Lecture Notes In Computer Science due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2023, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category .

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations from Scopus Elsevier, it yields a value for the Field-Weighted Citation Impact from the Scopus agency: 1.9, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 13, 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-12-21, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 7
  • Scopus: 11
  • Google Scholar: 3
  • Open Alex: 4
[+]

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-12-21:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 2.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 2 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 15.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 7 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
[+]

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: United States of America.

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (Payne, TR) and Last Author (Stoilos, G).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been IGLESIAS MOLINA, ANA.

[+]