{rfName}

Indexed in

License and use

Citations

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Carpio De Los Pinos, Antonio JoseCorresponding AuthorGonzalez Garcia, M. De Las NievesAuthor

Share

March 11, 2024
Publications
>
Chapter
No

Chapter 1: Theoretical Analysis of the Workers Movement Prediction in Construction Sites and Their Stress Level for the Dangerous Situation Prevention

Publicated to:Studies In Systems, Decision And Control. 449 3-15 - 2022-09-17 449(), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12547-8_1

Authors: Antonio José Carpio de los Pinos, María de la Nieves González García, João Santos Baptista, María Fernanda Silva Rodrigues

Affiliations

Abstract

The occupational risk assessment methodology called Level of Preventive Action (Lpac) evaluates the amount of preventive action to obtain an optimal prevention level, measuring the degree of danger concerning the building geometry, the worker position concerning the slab edge and the worker’s emotional states. The mathematical basis of Lpac can be extended to include the perspective of collective behaviour models, which can describe the predictable human behaviour based on the probability of acts. Research in the mathematical field satisfactorily models the movement that individuals follow or will follow in different scenarios (e.g., street crossing, emergency evacuation), including social parameters such as mood and emotions. This paper presents a theoretical case applied to the predictive analysis of behaviours and interactions between individuals working on constructing a slab. It is essential to include the worker’s movement prediction regarding unsafe acts and movements in the risk assessment and add the emotional states. From a case study at the microscopic level, stress can trigger dangerous situations, and its evaluation can prevent them

Keywords

Entorno de trabajoEstrés laboralEvaluación de riesgosHeurística. teseoPercepción

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Studies In Systems, Decision And Control, Q4 Agency Scopus (SJR), its regional focus and specialization in Social Sciences (Miscellaneous), give it significant recognition in a specific niche of scientific knowledge at an international level.

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-31:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 2 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: https://oa.upm.es/88536/

As a result of the publication of the work in the institutional repository, statistical usage data has been obtained that reflects its impact. In terms of dissemination, we can state that, as of

  • Views: 36
  • Downloads: 2

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: Last Author (CARPIO DE LOS PINOS, ANTONIO JOSE).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been CARPIO DE LOS PINOS, ANTONIO JOSE.