{rfName}
In

License and Use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Hernando, AntonioCorresponding AuthorBobadilla, JesusAuthorOrtega, FernandoAuthorTejedor, JorgeAuthor

Share

June 9, 2019
Publications
>
Article

Incorporating reliability measurements into the predictions of a recommender system

Publicated to: INFORMATION SCIENCES. 218 1-16 - 2013-01-01 218(), DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.06.027

Authors:

Hernando, A; Bobadilla, J; Ortega, F; Tejedor, J
[+]

Affiliations

Univ Politecn Madrid, Filmaffin Res Team, E-28040 Madrid, Spain - Author

Abstract

In this paper we introduce the idea of using a reliability measure associated to the predictions made by recommender systems based on collaborative filtering. This reliability measure is based on the usual notion that the more reliable a prediction, the less liable to be wrong. Here we will define a general reliability measure suitable for any arbitrary recommender system. We will also show a method for obtaining specific reliability measures specially fitting the needs of different specific recommender systems. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[+]

Keywords

Collaborative filteringCredibilityRaterRecommender systemReliability measureTrust

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal INFORMATION SCIENCES due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2013, it was in position 8/135, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Computer Science, Information Systems.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 2.06. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 13, 2025)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 1.46 (source consulted: FECYT Mar 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2026-04-25, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 49
  • Scopus: 54
  • Google Scholar: 83
[+]

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2026-04-25:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 83 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: https://oa.upm.es/15304/

As a result of the publication of the work in the institutional repository, statistical usage data has been obtained that reflects its impact. In terms of dissemination, we can state that, as of

  • Views: 476
  • Downloads: 1,072
[+]

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (HERNANDO ESTEBAN, ANTONIO) and Last Author (TEJEDOR CERBEL, JORGE AURELIO).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been HERNANDO ESTEBAN, ANTONIO.

[+]