{rfName}
Su

Indexed in

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Citations

19

Altmetrics

Article has an altmetric score of 2

Grant support

The research leading to the presented results has been partially undertaken within the SWAMRs European project (Smart and Networking Underwater Robots in Cooperation Meshes), under Grant Agreement n. 662107-SWARMs-ECSEL-2014-1, partially supported by the ECSEL JU and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Ref: PCIN-2014-022-C02-02).

Analysis of institutional authors

Lucas Martinez, NestorCorresponding AuthorMartinez-Ortega, Jose-FerninAuthorCastillejo, PedroAuthorBeltran Martinez, VictoriaCorresponding Author

Share

May 12, 2020
Publications
>
Article
Sí

Survey of Mission Planning and Management Architectures for Underwater Cooperative Robotics Operations

Publicated to:Applied Sciences-Basel. 10 (3): 1086- - 2020-02-01 10(3), DOI: 10.3390/app10031086

Authors: Lucas Martinez, Nestor; Martinez-Ortega, Jose-Fernin; Castillejo, Pedro; Beltran Martinez, Victoria

Affiliations

Univ Politecn Madrid, Dept Ingn Telemat & Elect DTE, ETSIST, C Nikola Tesla S-N, Madrid 28031, Spain - Author

Abstract

Almost every research project that focuses on the cooperation of autonomous robots for underwater operations designs their own architectures. As a result, most of these architectures are tightly coupled with the available robots/vehicles for their respective developments, and therefore the mission plan and management is done using an ad-hoc solution. Typically, this solution is tightly coupled to just one underwater autonomous vehicle (AUV), or a restricted set of them selected for the specific project. However, as the use of AUVs for underwater operations increases, there is the need to identify some commonalities and weaknesses of these architectures, specifically in relation to mission planning and management. In this paper, we review a selected number of architectures and frameworks that in one way or another make use of different approaches to mission planning and management. Most of the selected works were developed for underwater operations. Still, we have included some other architectures and frameworks from other domains that can be of interest for the survey. The explored works have been assessed using selected features related to mission planning and management, considering that underwater operations are performed in an uncertain and unreliable environment, and where unexpected events are not strange. Furthermore, we have identified and highlighted some potential challenges for the design and implementation of mission managers. This provides a reference point for the development of a mission manager component to be integrated in architectures for cooperative robotics in underwater operations, and it can serve for the same purposes in other domains of application.

Keywords

Agent virtualizationCooperative roboticsMission managementMission planMission plan adaptationMission plan dispatching and executionSystem architectures

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Applied Sciences-Basel due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2020, it was in position 38/90, thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Engineering, Multidisciplinary. Notably, the journal is positioned en el Cuartil Q2 para la agencia Scopus (SJR) en la categoría Instrumentation.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 1.38, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-31, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 4
  • Scopus: 5
  • Google Scholar: 10

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-31:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 32.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 34 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.85.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 2 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (LUCAS MARTINEZ, NESTOR) and Last Author (BELTRAN MARTINEZ, MARIA VICTORIA).

the authors responsible for correspondence tasks have been LUCAS MARTINEZ, NESTOR and BELTRAN MARTINEZ, MARIA VICTORIA.