May 23, 2022
Publications
>
Article
No

Nitrous oxide emissions and microbial communities during the transition to conservation agriculture using N-enhanced efficiency fertilisers in a semiarid climate

Publicated to: SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY. 170 108687- - 2022-07-01 170(), DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108687

Authors:

Montoya, M; Juhanson, J; Hallin, S; García-Gutiérrez, S; García-Marco, S; Vallejo, A; Recio, J; Guardia, G
[+]

Affiliations

Centro de Estudios e Investigación para la Gestión de Riesgos Agrarios y Medioambientales , Universidad Politécnica de Madrid - Author
Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet - Author
Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Mycol & Plant Pathol, Uppsala, Sweden - Author
Univ Politecn Madrid UPM, Ctr Estudios & Invest Gest Riesgos Agr & Medioamn, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Politecn Madrid UPM, Dept Quim & Tecnol Alimentos, ETSI Agron Alimentaria & Biosistemas, Ave Puerta de Hierro 2-4, Madrid 28040, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

The transition year from tillage to no tillage in semiarid areas and its effects on nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and related microbial communities, as well as the potential interaction with N management, including enhanced-efficiency fertilisers, are not well studied despite their economic and environmental implications. In tilled and nontilled plots, the effectiveness of the double DMPSA + NBPT inhibitor (applied with urea at basal fertilisation) and that of DMPSA (applied with calcium ammonium nitrate at top-dressing) in the mitigation of N2O emissions were evaluated in a rainfed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop in central Spain. Crop yield, nitrogen (N) uptake, the abundances of key genes involved in nitrification and denitrification processes and meteorological conditions and soil ancillary properties were monitored. In addition, the composition of bacterial communities was determined by sequencing the 16S rRNA gene. Fertilisers with inhibitors decreased cumulative N2O emissions and yield-scaled N2O emissions by 53% and 56%, respectively, with respect to those without inhibitors, which coincided with a trend of increasing grain and biomass yield and aboveground N uptake (by 11.3%, 9.2% and 7.2%, respectively). The highest N2O emissions were measured 49 days after harvest (immediately after a rainfall event that like reactivated soil microorganisms), reaching 15 mg N m−2 d−1 for the treatment with fertiliser without inhibitor combined with tillage. This peak was linked to a remarkable increase in the abundance of denitrifiers. The abundance of nitrifiers and denitrifiers successfully explained the N2O dynamics observed after basal fertilisation (i.e. an increase in the amoA/nosZ ratio in fertilised plots with inhibitors, where the highest emissions were observed). Our results also showed a reduction in the abundance of the phylum Nitrospirae throughout the cropping period in the plots that received inhibitors. No tillage led to a higher abundance of Cyanobacteria, Verrucomicrobia and Bacteroidetes and resulted in better implantation of the crop and higher plant density compared with tillage, thus increasing yields and N use efficiency and decreasing N2O emissions. Under the conditions of our study, shifting from conventional tillage to no tillage enhanced the balance between N use efficiency and yield-scaled N2O emissions in the first year of conversion, particularity with the use of the double inhibitor with urea at basal fertilisation and DMPSA with CAN at dressing.
[+]

Keywords

bacterial communitiesdrying-rewetting pulsesglobal warming potentialgreenhouse-gas emissionsimpactsmicrobial diversityn2o emissionnitrogen use efficiencynosz genesresidue managementribosomal-rnatillage systemsurease inhibitoryieldAmmonia-oxidizing archaeaDrying-rewetting pulsesGlobal warming potentialGreenhouse gas emissionsMicrobial diversityNitrogen use efficiencyUrease inhibitor

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2022, it was in position 2/37, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Soil Science. Notably, the journal is positioned above the 90th percentile.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations provided by WoS (ESI, Clarivate), it yields a value for the citation normalization relative to the expected citation rate of: 1.19. This indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 13, 2025)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Weighted Average of Normalized Impact by the Scopus agency: 1.37 (source consulted: FECYT Mar 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2026-04-27, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 12
  • Scopus: 14
  • Google Scholar: 6
[+]

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2026-04-27:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 31.

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 8.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: https://oa.upm.es/92034/

As a result of the publication of the work in the institutional repository, statistical usage data has been obtained that reflects its impact. In terms of dissemination, we can state that, as of

  • Views: 49
  • Downloads: 17
[+]

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Sweden.

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (MONTOYA NOVILLO, MONICA) and Last Author (GUARDIA VAZQUEZ, GUILLERMO).

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been MONTOYA NOVILLO, MONICA.

[+]