
Indexado en
Licencia y uso
Altmetrics

- Citas
- Índice de Citas: 8
- Capturas
- Lectores: 69
- Menciones
- Menciones Blog: 1
- Menciones Noticias: 1
Grant support
This work has been carried out in the frame of the AlSiCal project, funded by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N degrees 820911. The purpose of this research within the AlSiCal project was to get knowledge about the Bayer process and to use these data as a benchmarking on alumina production, given that the AlSiCal new technology aims to produce alumina, silica, and precipitated calcium carbonate from anorthosite minerals.
Análisis de autorías institucional
Garcia-Franco, EnriqueAutor o CoautorThe effects of energy consumption of alumina production in the environmental impacts using life cycle assessment
Publicado en:International Journal Of Life Cycle Assessment. 29 (3): 380-393 - 2023-12-12 29(3), DOI: 10.1007/s11367-023-02257-8
Autores: Saez-Guinoa, Javier; Garcia-Franco, Enrique; Llera-Sastresa, Eva; Romeo, Luis M
Afiliaciones
Resumen
PurposeAluminium industry emits around 1-2% of the world's total greenhouse gas emissions. Up to one-third of those are linked to the thermal energy consumed during its initial process: the alumina refining (Bayer process). Previous studies consider the Bayer process a single stage despite its being made of several reaction stages. This work presents a disaggregated energy analysis of the Bayer process that facilitates to find relationships between the main variables in regular alumina production and the environmental impacts.MethodsTwo different thermodynamic simulations of the Bayer process were carried out using Aspen V11 software. The results of these simulations were validated with referenced data, and afterwards, they were used to perform a life cycle assessment. ISO 14040 and 14,044 standards were followed during the analysis. LCA was implemented on SimaPro 9.0, and ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) method was used to calculate environmental impacts. The influence of bauxite mineral form, type of fuel (energy input), and the distance from the mine to the plant was analysed throughout the study.Results and discussionAs expected, the type of fuel was revealed as the most crucial factor in the environmental impact of alumina production, with potential savings of up to 75.5% of CO2-equivalent emissions. Nonetheless, the tendency is diverse for other indicators, such as marine eutrophication or terrestrial acidification. On the other hand, while bauxite transportation always has the same impact on the different environmental indicators, bauxite mineral form affects differently depending on the fuel, causing variations in the CO2-eq emissions from 7.7 to 51.3%.ConclusionsResults indicated that the electrification of heat-demanding processes and the use of renewable power is the most effective approach for reducing environmental impacts. This strategy, however, must be considered in combination with others, as interdependent effects exist on the type of mineral used. These results provide strong evidence of the potential for environmentally friendly strategies in the metal industry, including new processes, alternative fuels, or mineral switching to promote more sustainable aluminium production.
Palabras clave
Indicios de calidad
Impacto bibliométrico. Análisis de la aportación y canal de difusión
El trabajo ha sido publicado en la revista International Journal Of Life Cycle Assessment debido a la progresión y el buen impacto que ha alcanzado en los últimos años, según la agencia WoS (JCR), se ha convertido en una referencia en su campo. En el año de publicación del trabajo, 2023, se encontraba en la posición 84/358, consiguiendo con ello situarse como revista Q1 (Primer Cuartil), en la categoría Environmental Sciences.
Desde una perspectiva relativa, y atendiendo al indicador del impacto normalizado calculado a partir del Field Citation Ratio (FCR) de la fuente Dimensions, arroja un valor de: 7.52, lo que indica que, de manera comparada con trabajos en la misma disciplina y en el mismo año de publicación, lo ubica como trabajo citado por encima de la media. (fuente consultada: Dimensions May 2025)
De manera concreta y atendiendo a las diferentes agencias de indexación, el trabajo ha acumulado, hasta la fecha 2025-05-03, el siguiente número de citas:
- Scopus: 8
- OpenCitations: 3