Documentation of Quality Requirements in Agile Software Development
Publicado en:Acm International Conference Proceeding Series. 250-259 - 2020-04-15 (), DOI: 10.1145/3383219.3383245
Autores: Behutiye W; Seppänen P; Rodríguez P; Oivo M
Afiliaciones
Resumen
Context: Quality requirements (QRs) have a significant role in the success of software projects. In agile software development (ASD), where working software is valued over comprehensive documentation, QRs are often under-specified or not documented. Consequently, they may be handled improperly and result in degraded software quality and increased maintenance costs. Investigating the documentation of QRs in ASD, would provide evidence on existing practices, tools and aspects considered in ASD that other practitioners might utilize to improve documentation and management of QRs in ASD. Although there are some studies examining documentation in ASD, those that specifically investigate the documentation of QRs in depth are lacking. Method: we conducted a multiple case study by interviewing 15 practitioners of four ASD cases, to provide empirical evidence on documentation of QRs in ASD. We also run workshops with two of the cases, to identify important aspects that ASD practitioners consider when documenting QRs in requirements management repositories. Result and conclusions: ASD companies approach documentation of QRs to fit the needs of their context. They used tools, backlogs, iterative prototypes, and artifacts such as epic, and stories to document QRs, or utilized face-face communication without documenting QRs. We observed that documentation of QRs in ASD is affected by factors such as context (e.g. product domain, and size) and the experience of practitioners. Some tools used to document QRs also enhanced customer collaboration, enabling customers report and document QRs. Aspects such as levels of abstraction, the traceability of QRs, optimal details of information of QRs and verification and validation are deemed important when documenting QRs in ASD requirements management repositories.
Palabras clave
Indicios de calidad
Impacto bibliométrico. Análisis de la aportación y canal de difusión
Desde una perspectiva relativa, y atendiendo al indicador del impacto normalizado calculado a partir del Field Citation Ratio (FCR) de la fuente Dimensions, arroja un valor de: 9.41, lo que indica que, de manera comparada con trabajos en la misma disciplina y en el mismo año de publicación, lo ubica como trabajo citado por encima de la media. (fuente consultada: Dimensions Jul 2025)
De manera concreta y atendiendo a las diferentes agencias de indexación, el trabajo ha acumulado, hasta la fecha 2025-07-16, el siguiente número de citas:
- Scopus: 18
Impacto y visibilidad social
Análisis de liderazgo de los autores institucionales
Este trabajo se ha realizado con colaboración internacional, concretamente con investigadores de: Finland.