Publications
>
Article

Work-from-home impacts on software project: A global study on software development practices and stakeholder perceptions

Publicated to:Software-Practice & Experience. 54 (5): 896-926 - 2024-05-01 54(5), DOI: 10.1002/spe.3306

Authors: Anh, ND; Khanna, D; Le, GH; Greer, D; Wang, XF; Zaina, LM; Matturro, G; Melegati, J; Guerra, E; Kettunen, P; Hyrynsalmi, S; Edison, H; Sales, A; Chanin, R; Rutitis, D; Kemell, KK; Aldaeej, A; Mikkonen, T; Garbajosa, J; Abrahamsson, P

Affiliations

BA Sch Business & Finance, Sch Business & Finance, Riga, Latvia - Author
Banku Augstskola - Author
Blekinge Inst Technol, Dept Software Engn, Karlskrona, Sweden - Author
Blekinge Tekniska Högskola - Author
Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Fac Comp Sci, Bolzano, Italy - Author
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano - Author
Helsingin Yliopisto - Author
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal Univ, Dept Management Informat Syst, Dammam, Saudi Arabia - Author
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal university - Author
LUT University - Author
Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet - Author
Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Comp Sci, Trondheim, Norway - Author
Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Trondheim, Norway - Author
Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Fac Social Sci, Oslo, Norway - Author
OsloMet – storbyuniversitetet - Author
Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Sch Technol, Porto Alegre, Brazil - Author
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - Author
Queen's University Belfast - Author
Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Elect Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Belfast, North Ireland - Author
Tampere Univ, Fac Informat Technol & Commun Sci, Tampere, Finland - Author
Tampere University - Author
Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Dept Comp, Sao Carlos, Brazil - Author
Univ Helsinki, Dept Comp Sci, Helsinki, Finland - Author
Univ Jyvaskyla, Fac Informat Technol, Jyvaskyla, Finland - Author
Univ Lappeenranta, Software Engn Dept, Lappeenranta, Finland - Author
Univ ORT Uruguay, Dept Software Engn, Montevideo, Uruguay - Author
Univ Politecn Madrid, Comp Syst Engn Sch ETSISI, Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ South Eastern Norway, Dept Comp Sci, Trondheim, Norway - Author
Universidad ORT Uruguay - Author
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid - Author
Universidade Federal de São Carlos - Author
University of Jyväskylä - Author
See more

Abstract

Context: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a disruptive impact on how people work and collaborate across all global economic sectors, including software business. While remote working is not new for software engineers, forced WFH situations come with both limitations and opportunities. As the ‘new normal’ for working might be based on the current state of Work-from-home (WFH), it is useful to understand what has happened and learn from that. Objective: This study aims to gain insights into how their WFH arrangement impacts project management and software engineering. We are also interested in exploring these impacts in different contexts, such as startups and established companies. Method: We conducted a global-scale, cross-sectional survey during the spring and summer 2021. Our results are based on quantitative and qualitative analysis of 297 valid responses. Results: We characterize the profile of WFH in both spatial and temporal aspects, together with a set of common collaborative tools and coordination and control mechanisms. We revealed some areas of project management that are relatively more challenging during WFH situations, such as coordination, communication and project planning. We also revealed a mixed picture of the perceived impact of WFH on different software engineering activities. Conclusion: WFH is a situational phenomenon which can have both negative and positive impact on software teams. For practitioners, we suggest a unified approach to consider the context of WFH, collaborative tools, associated coordination and control approaches and a process that resolve those aspects that are sensitive to physical interaction.

Keywords

challengesempirical studyengineersproject managementrequirementssoftware engineeringspacetechnologyteleworkingtoolswork-from-homeCoordinationCovid-19Empirical studyProject managementSoftware engineeringWork-from-home

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Software-Practice & Experience due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2024 there are still no calculated indicators, but in 2023, it was in position 49/132, thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Computer Science, Software Engineering. Notably, the journal is positioned en el Cuartil Q2 para la agencia Scopus (SJR) en la categoría Software.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 2.8, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-09, the following number of citations:

  • Scopus: 2
  • OpenCitations: 1

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-09:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 49.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 47 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 1.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: https://oa.upm.es/88762/

As a result of the publication of the work in the institutional repository, statistical usage data has been obtained that reflects its impact. In terms of dissemination, we can state that, as of

  • Views: 41
  • Downloads: 1

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Brazil; Finland; Gran Bretanya; Italy; Latvia; Norway; Saudi Arabia; Sweden; United Kingdom; Uruguay.

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (GARBAJOSA SOPEÑA, JUAN) .