{rfName}
Va

Indexed in

License and Use

Icono OpenAccess

Citations

1

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Manners R.Author

Share

September 24, 2025
Publications
>
Article
No

Validating self-administration as an agile modality for high-frequency diet quality data collection

Publicated to: PLOS ONE. 20 (6 June): - 2025-01-01 20(6 June), DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317611

Authors:

Manners R; Herforth AW; Delfine M; Hesen R; Nkubito D; den Berg KB-V; Matsiko E; Niyibituronsa M; Uyar BTM; Talsma EF
[+]

Affiliations

Division of Human Nutrition and Health; Wageningen University and Research (WUR); Netherlands - Author
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture; Kigali; Rwanda - Author
Rwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board (RAB); Rwanda - Author
Strategic Development and Research Group; Kigali; Rwanda - Author
University of Rwanda; Kigali; Rwanda - Author
See more

Abstract

Data collection of diet quality is important to estimate global dietary transitions affecting public health. Mobile-phone based tools can provide a low-cost and rapidly deployable modality to complement enumerator-collected data. This study validated self-administration of the Diet Quality Questionnaire using mobile phones, comparing accuracy against enumerator administration, measuring both against an observed benchmark. Quantitative dietary intake data were gathered from 308 participants in northwest Rwanda, using a weighed food record. Intake data were used to calculated ‘observed’ responses to the questionnaire, half the participants responding to enumerators, and the other half using a mobile-administered version of the questionnaire. After filtering for low quality data, agreement in observed and reported responses, for all questionnaire questions, were statistically compared. Agreement rates (observed-reported) of self-administered and enumerated responses were high (91% vs 95%, p = 0.05), respectively. Agreement was significantly lower for the mobile-administered modality among older and lower income respondents (by about 5 percentage points), with no significant differences by gender or time of response. Mobile-administration cost approximately USD 0.70 per response, versus the marginal cost of USD 0.79 for the enumerator-administered. Our results confirm self-administered reporting by mobile-phone as a valid, low-cost method for collecting dietary data, with only marginal (yet significant for some subgroups) differences in agreement rates, compared to enumerated data. Data collection by mobile phone represents an agile complement to enumerated collection, administrable in the absence of existing survey platforms; and provides a useful option for high-frequency data collection to monitor dietary dynamics in target sub-populations. © 2025 Manners et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
[+]

Keywords

AdolescentAdultAgedArticleBenchmarkingBeverageCell phoneCell phone useCohort analysisCost benefit analysisData collectionDietDiet qualityDiet quality questionnaireDiet recordsDiet surveysDrug self administrationEducational statusEmployment statusFemaleFood frequency questionnaireFood intakeFruit consumptionHumanHumansInformation processingInteractive voice responseInterviewKitchenLowest income groupMaleMeal sizeMedical recordMiddle agedMobile phoneProceduresQuestionnaireRecall biasSelf administrationSelf conceptSocioeconomicsSurveys and questionnairesTime intervalValidation processValidation studyVegetable consumptionYoung adult

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal PLOS ONE due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2025, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Multidisciplinary.

[+]

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2026-04-12:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 13 (PlumX).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
[+]

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: Netherlands; Rwanda.

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (MANNERS, RHYS) .

[+]