{rfName}
Co

Indexed in

License and use

Altmetrics

Grant support

This work is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (contract number FPU14/03435 to JSM); University of Alcala (contract number FPI2016 to PLV); Universidad Europea de Madrid [2015/UEM05, 2017/UEM14 and 2018/UEM02 and UEM2020/36]; and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias and Fondos FEDER [grant numbers PI15/00558 and PI18/00139 to AL] and Miguel Servet research contract [ref. #CP18/00034 to CFL]).

Analysis of institutional authors

Olivan, JesusAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Article

Concurrent Exercise Interventions in Breast Cancer Survivors with Cancer-related Fatigue

Publicated to:International Journal Of Sports Medicine. 41 (11): 790-797 - 2020-01-01 41(11), DOI: 10.1055/a-1147-1513

Authors: Pagola, Itiziar; Morales, Javier S; Alejo, Lidia B; Barcelo, Olga; Montil, Marta; Olivan, Jesus; Alvarez-Bustos, Alejandro; Cantos, Blanca; Maximiano, Constanza; Hidalgo, Francisco; Valenzuela, Pedro L; Fiuza-Luces, Carmen; Lucia, Alejandro; Ruiz-Casado, Ana

Affiliations

‎ 12th October Hosp, Res Inst, Physiol, Madrid, Spain - Author
‎ Puerta Hierro Univ Hosp Majadahonda, Dept Med Oncol, Majadahonda, Spain - Author
‎ Univ Alcala de Henares, Syst Biol Dept, Physiol Unit, Madrid, Spain - Author
‎ Univ Europea Madrid, Fac Sport Sci, Madrid, Spain - Author
‎ Univ Politecn Madrid, Sch Phys Act & Sport Sci INEF, Madrid, Spain - Author
See more

Abstract

This study compared the effects of two supervised concurrent training interventions in breast cancer survivors with cancer-related fatigue at baseline. Twenty-three female breast cancer survivors (50 +/- 8 years) were randomized to a high- (n=13) or a moderate-intensity (n=10) training program. Both interventions lasted 16 weeks and included the same resistance exercises, but the aerobic component was supervised and more intense in the former (i.e., rating of perceived exertion of 7-8 vs. 6 on a 1-10 scale for the high and moderate-intensity intervention, respectively). The primary endpoint was fatigue perception. Endpoints were assessed at baseline and after 16 weeks. The p-value for statistical significance was set at 0.004 after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. The high-intensity training program increased lower-limb muscle strength significantly (p=0.002) and tended to improve fatigue perception (p=0.006), waist circumference (p=0.013), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (p=0.028) and some quality of life items (p=0.011). Although the moderate-intensity training program did not provide such benefits in general (i.e., higher p-values for pre vs post-intervention comparisons), no significant differences were found between interventions (all p>0.004). Further research is needed to elucidate if the benefits provided by high-intensity concurrent training are superior to those elicited by moderate-intensity training in breast cancer survivors.

Keywords

AnthropometryBiological markerBiomarkersBloodBody compositionBreast neoplasmsBreast tumorCancer survivorCancer survivorsCardiorespiratory fitnessChemotherapyComplicationControlled studyExerciseExercise is medicineExercise therapyFatigueFemaleHigh intensity interval trainingHigh-intensity interval trainingHigh-intensity trainingHumanHumansImpactKinesiotherapyLower extremityLower limbMiddle agedMuscle strengthPerceptionPhysical activityPhysical exertionPhysical fitnessPhysical-activityPhysiologyProceduresQuality of lifeQuality-of-lifeRandomized controlled trialResistance trainingStrength

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal International Journal Of Sports Medicine due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2020, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations from Scopus Elsevier, it yields a value for the Field-Weighted Citation Impact from the Scopus agency: 2.25, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)

This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:

  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 9.16 (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-10, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 6
  • Scopus: 29
  • OpenCitations: 10

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-10:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 289.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 283 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 5.85.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 10 (Altmetric).