February 23, 2021
Publications
>
Article

Comparison Between Supervised and Unsupervised Classifications of Neuronal Cell Types: A Case Study

Publicated to: Developmental Neurobiology. 71 (1): 71-82 - 2011-01-01 71(1), DOI: 10.1002/dneu.20809

Authors:

Guerra, L; McGarry, LM; Robles, V; Bielza, C; Larrañaga, P; Yuste, R
[+]

Affiliations

Columbia Univ, Dept Biol Sci, HHMI, New York, NY 10027 USA - Author
Computational Intelligence Group. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid - Author
Univ Politecn Madrid, Fac Informat, Dept Arquitectura & Tecnol Sistemas Informat, E-28040 Madrid, Spain - Author
Univ Politecn Madrid, Fac Informat, Dept Inteligencia Artificial, E-28040 Madrid, Spain - Author
See more

Keywords

AlgorithmsAnimalsCell shapeCerebral cortexClassificationClusteringImage cytometryInterneuronInterneuronsMapMiceMice, inbred c57blNeocortical interneuronsOrgan culture techniquesPyramidal cellPyramidal cellsRepresentationSupervisedVisual-cortex

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Developmental Neurobiology due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2011, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Developmental Neuroscience.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2026-02-02:

  • Google Scholar: 122
  • WoS: 67
  • Scopus: 73
  • Europe PMC: 25
[+]

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2026-02-02:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 131.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 131 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 3.

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
  • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: https://oa.upm.es/7284/

As a result of the publication of the work in the institutional repository, statistical usage data has been obtained that reflects its impact. In terms of dissemination, we can state that, as of

  • Views: 566
  • Downloads: 345
[+]

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

This work has been carried out with international collaboration, specifically with researchers from: United States of America.

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (Guerra, Luis) .

the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been Guerra, Luis.

[+]