{rfName}

License and Use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Marotta, ACorresponding AuthorPorras-Amores, CAuthorSanchez, ArAuthor

Share

November 15, 2021
Publications
>
Article

Resilient Built Environment: Critical Review of the Strategies Released by the Sustainability Rating Systems in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Publicated to: Sustainability. 13 (20): 11164- - 2021-10-01 13(20), DOI: 10.3390/su132011164

Authors:

Marotta, Antonio; Porras-Amores, Cesar; Sanchez, Antonio Rodriguez;
[+]

Affiliations

Tecnología Edificatoria y Medio Ambiente. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid - Author
Univ Politecn Madrid, Escuela Tecn Super Edificac UPM, Dept Construcc Arquitecton & Control, Ave Juan Herrera,6, Madrid 28040, Spain - Author

Abstract

Since the COVID-19 outbreak, buildings have been viewed as a facilitator of disease spread, where the three main transmission routes (contact, droplets, aerosols) are more likely to happen. However, with proper policies and measures, buildings can be better prepared for re-occupancy and beyond. This study reviews the strategies developed by several Sustainability Rating Systems (SRS, namely WELL, Fitwel and LEED) to respond to any infectious disease and ensure that building occupants protect and maintain their health. The best practices, that are similar between each SRS, highlight that the overall sustainability of the spaces increases if they are resilient. Results indicate that SRS promote a weak sustainability approach since they accept that economic development can reduce natural capitals. SRS are also characterized by an aggregated level of assessment of different criteria that does not allow to map different choices. However, the decomposition of the concept of sustainability in its three bottom lines (i.e., environmental, social and economic) shows that preventive strategies are likely to be systematically adopted as the state-of-the-art. Finally, even if the latest research points out the airborne transmission as the major infection route, the SRS lack analytical measures to address issues such as social distancing.

[+]

Keywords

ArchitectureCoronavirusesCovid-19Covid‐19FitwelGreen buildingsHealthy buildingsIndoor environmental qualityLeedRespiratory disease transmissionSarsSars-cov-2Sars‐cov‐2Sustainability rating systemsWellWuhan

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Sustainability due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2021, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Geography, Planning and Development.

Independientemente del impacto esperado determinado por el canal de difusión, es importante destacar el impacto real observado de la propia aportación.

Según las diferentes agencias de indexación, el número de citas acumuladas por esta publicación hasta la fecha 2025-12-20:

  • WoS: 2
  • Scopus: 9
[+]

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-12-20:

  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 48 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

    It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

    • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.
    • Assignment of a Handle/URN as an identifier within the deposit in the Institutional Repository: https://oa.upm.es/78209/

    As a result of the publication of the work in the institutional repository, statistical usage data has been obtained that reflects its impact. In terms of dissemination, we can state that, as of

    • Views: 216
    • Downloads: 71
    [+]

    Leadership analysis of institutional authors

    There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: First Author (MAROTTA, ANTONIO) and Last Author (RODRIGUEZ SANCHEZ, ANTONIO).

    the author responsible for correspondence tasks has been MAROTTA, ANTONIO.

    [+]