{rfName}
Ar

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Roquero EAuthor

Share

February 27, 2023
Publications
>
Article

Archaeoseismological Evidence of Seismic Damage at Medina Azahara (Córdoba, Spain) from the Early 11th Century

Publicated to:Applied Sciences-Basel. 13 (3): 1601- - 2023-02-01 13(3), DOI: 10.3390/app13031601

Authors: Rodríguez-Pascua, MA; Perucha, MA; Silva, PG; Córdoba, AJM; Giner-Robles, JL; Élez, J; Bardají, T; Roquero, E; Sánchez-Sánchez, Y

Affiliations

Consejeria Cultura & Patrimonio Histor, Capitulares 2, Cordoba 14002, Spain - Author
CSIC, Inst Geol & Minero Espana IGME, Rios Rosas 23, Madrid 28003, Spain - Author
CSIC-IGME - Instituto Geológico y Minero de España - Author
Junta de Andalucía - Author
Univ Alcala, Fac Ciencias, Dept Geol Geog & Medio Ambiente, Alcala De Henares 28871, Spain - Author
Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Ciencias, Dept Geol, Tres Cantos 28049, Spain - Author
Univ Politecn Madrid, Dept Edafol, ETSI Agronomos, Madrid 28040, Spain - Author
Univ Salamanca, Escuela Politecn Super Avila, Dept Geol, Hornos Caleros 50, Avila 05003, Spain - Author
Univ Salamanca, Fac Ciencias, Dept Geol, Plaza Merced S-N, Salamanca 37008, Spain - Author
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid - Author
Universidad de Alcalá - Author
Universidad de Salamanca - Author
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid - Author
See more

Abstract

The “Caliphal City of Medina Azahara” was built in 936–937 CE or 940–941 CE (depending on the source) by the first Caliph of al-Andalus Abd al-Rahman III, being recently inscribed (2018) on the UNESCO World Heritage List. The abandonment and destruction of the city have been traditionally related to the civil war (“fitna”) that started between 1009 and 1010 CE. However, we cannot rule out other causes for the rapid depopulation and plundering of the city just a few decades after its foundation. The archaeoseismological study provides the first clues on the possible role played by an earthquake in the sudden abandonment and ruin of the city. Eleven different types of Earthquake Archaeological Effects (EAEs) have been identified, such as dropped key stones in arches, tilted walls, conjugated fractures in brick-made walls, conjugated fractures and folds in regular pavements and dipping broken corners in columns, among others. Besides that, 163 structural measures on EAEs were surveyed resulting in a mean ground movement direction of N140°–160° E. This geological structural analysis clearly indicates a building-oriented damage, which can be reasonably attributed to an earthquake that devastated Medina Azahara during the 11st or 12th centuries CE. If this were the case, two strong earthquakes (≥VIII MSK/EMS) occurred in 1024–1025 CE and 1169–1170 CE could be the suspected causative events of the damage and destruction of the city.

Keywords

archaeological sitesbaelo-claudiabasincadizcity destruction and abandonmentearthquakeearthquake archaeological effects (eaes)geological structural analysismorenasouth spainAncient-roman cityCity destruction and abandonmentEarthquake archaeological effects (eaes)Geological structural analysisMedina azaharaSouth spain

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal Applied Sciences-Basel due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2023, it was in position 44/181, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Engineering, Multidisciplinary.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 8.06, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-26, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 4
  • Scopus: 4

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-07-26:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 6.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 8 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 18.1.
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 7 (Altmetric).
  • The number of mentions in news outlets: 1 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.