
Indexed in
License and use
Grant support
CEDEX would like to acknowledge both ESAMUR and ACA for the collaboration and the supply of the required data to perform this study. Authors also acknowledge the support from the Economy and Knowledge Department of the Catalan Government (Consolidated Research Groups 2014 SGR 291 - ICRA and 2014-SGR-1168 - LEQUIA).
Analysis of institutional authors
Arce, AugustoAuthorCost comparison of full-scale water reclamation technologies with an emphasis on membrane bioreactors
Publicated to:Water Science And Technology. 75 (11): 2562-2570 - 2017-06-01 75(11), DOI: 10.2166/wst.2017.132
Authors: Iglesias, Raquel; Simon, Pedro; Moragas, Lucas; Arce, Augusto; Rodriguez-Roda, Ignasi;
Affiliations
Abstract
The paper assesses the costs of full-scale membrane bioreactors (MBRs). Capital expenditures (CAPEX) and operating expenses (OPEX) of Spanish MBR facilities have been verified and compared to activated sludge plants (CAS) using water reclamation treatment (both conventional and advanced). Spanish MBR facilities require a production of 0.6 to 1.2 kWh per m(3), while extended aeration (EA) and advanced reclamation treatment require 1.2 kWh per m3. The energy represents around 40% of the OPEX in MBRs. In terms of CAPEX, the implementation costs of a CAS facility followed by conventional water reclamation treatment (physical-chemical + sand filtration + disinfection) ranged from 730 to 850 epsilon.m(-3)d, and from 1,050 to 1,250 epsilon.m(-3)d in the case of advanced reclamation treatment facilities (membrane filtration) with a capacity of 8,000 to 15,000 m(3)d(-1). The MBR cost for similar capacities ranges between 700 and 960 epsilon.m(-3)d. This study shows that MBRs that have been recently installed represent a cost competitive option for water reuse applications for medium and large capacities (over 10,000 m(3)d(-1)), with similar OPEX to EA and conventional water reclamation treatment. In terms of CAPEX, MBRs are cheaper than EA, followed by advanced water reclamation treatment.
Keywords
Quality index
Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel
The work has been published in the journal Water Science And Technology due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency Scopus (SJR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2017, it was in position , thus managing to position itself as a Q2 (Segundo Cuartil), in the category Environmental Engineering. Notably, the journal is positioned en el Cuartil Q3 for the agency WoS (JCR) in the category Water Resources.
From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from World Citations from Scopus Elsevier, it yields a value for the Field-Weighted Citation Impact from the Scopus agency: 1.7, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: ESI Nov 14, 2024)
This information is reinforced by other indicators of the same type, which, although dynamic over time and dependent on the set of average global citations at the time of their calculation, consistently position the work at some point among the top 50% most cited in its field:
- Field Citation Ratio (FCR) from Dimensions: 5.09 (source consulted: Dimensions Jul 2025)
Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-07-09, the following number of citations:
- WoS: 23
- Scopus: 67